In
lieu of my usual story and rant this week, I’m just posting some links
to some reading you can do for yourself. Again, I’m a big believer in
people educating themselves and making their own decisions, and all of
my posts so far are intended to make you think about these things for
yourself.
But sometimes it’s helpful to just say “Hey, read this” without editorializing (too much).
The
following are all Supreme Court Cases where the government was found to
be in violation of the Constitution in some form or another. To make
them easier to digest, I’m linking to the Wikipedia article for them
where it exists. Wikipedia is usually pretty accurate, and relatively
neutral, though not always. I encourage you to do your own research,
the references given in each Wikipedia article are a good place to
start.
United States v. Jones - attaching a GPS to a citizen’s vehicle to monitor his movements without a warrant violates the 4th Amendment.
Sackett v. EPA - imposing fines against landowners for non-compliance without due process violates the 4th Amendment
Arizona v. United States - States are within their 10th Amendment rights to uphold Federal Law regarding immigration.
Gabelli v. SEC - the Security and Exchange Commission must abide by it’s own statute of limitations.
Arkansas Fish & Game Commission v. United States - reinforces the Takings Clause of the 5th Amendment
Georgia v. Randolph - police need a warrant to search a residence if one resident objects to the search, even if another resident gives consent.
Various
blogs out there will try and paint some of these cases as evidence to
push an agenda that either Bush or Obama is evil. For example, the
first example - US V. Jones came from a Republican leaning blog that
used it as one example of how horrible the Obama administration is.
However, the fact is that the violation and the subsequent court case
began under the Bush administration, but was just as vigorously pursued
or defended under the Obama administration. Abuse of government power
by it’s bureaucrats does not suddenly change just because the President
is a member of one party or the other.
More interesting cases can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States
No comments:
Post a Comment